Κάτι εντελώς άσχετο με ενεργειακά... Αλλά σχετικό με εθνικές κυριαρχίες. Δόθηκε κάποια συνέντευξη από τον Ούγγρο ακόλουθο για αγροτικά θέματα στο Βουκουρέστι που φέρεται να είπε ότι η Ουγγαρία σχεδιάζει να αγοράσει αγροτικές εκτάσεις σε περιοχές της Δυτικής Ρουμανίας με σημαντικά ποσοστά μειονοτήτων που ομιλούν την Ουγγρική. Υπήρξαν επίσημες διαψεύσεις εκ μέρους της Ουγγαρίας, αλλά... αλλά... από το 1990 και μετά ξαναζωγραφίζεται ο χάρτης στην Κεντρική και Ανατολική Ευρώπη (και ίσως όχι μόνο). Βέβαια, ο διάδρομος από Πολωνία μέχρι Βουλγαρία έχει υπάρξει αντικείμενο σύγκρουσης μεταξύ Ρωσίας και "Δύσης" (αν και δεν ήξερα ότι η τέως Αυστροουγγρική Αυτοκρατορία θεωρείται "Δύση", ή η Πολωνία ...Ανατολή). Ας σημειωθεί ότι αποφάσισαν στην Ουγγαρία ότι στις εκλογές του 2014 θα ψηφίσουν και οι Ούγγροι που ζούνε εκτός Ουγγαρίας... Αν τώρα η γη τους ανήκει και στην Ουγγαρία... Που εξακολουθεί να μην είναι ενθουσιασμένη από την συνθήκη του Τριανόν του 1920...
Τον Οκτώβριο του 2013 η Βουλγαρική Βουλή αποφάσισε να παρατείνει την απαγόρευση πώλησης αγροτικής γης σε ξένους (δεν νομίζω ότι οι ...Ούγγροι ενδιαφέρονται για την Βουλγαρία, αλλά τίποτα σύμμαχοι της Αυστροουγγρικής Αυτοκρατορίας; Στο άρθρο αναφέρονται Ρουμάνοι σαν ενδιαφερόμενοι) και αντέδρασε η ..."Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση", αλλά δεν ενέδωσε η Βουλγαρία, που ζήτησε από την Κομισιόν να μπει όριο 1.000 στρεμμάτων, αλλά η Κομισιόν το απέρριψε, και το Βουκουρέστι δίνει κίνητρα και δάνεια κλπ.
Οι Ούγγροι πάλι, απαγόρευσαν από το 2012 αγορές αγροτικής γης από ξένους, αλλά μετά από πίεση από την "Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση", μετριάστηκε και αυτό. Βέβαια, το άρθρο αναφέρεται σε ρήγματα που εμπλέκεται η Ρωσία, αλλά θα προσέθετα εγώ ότι στην Ανατολική και Κεντρική Ευρώπη ο καθένας είναι τέως αυτοκρατορία και έχει την ατζέντα του και όλοι χρησιμοποιούν όλους για να κάνουν την δουλειά τους. Και αναρωτιέμαι πόσο ξεβράκωτοι είμαστε εμείς (εντελώς, θα έλεγα), ή τι άποψη έχει ο Αντιβασιλέας Φούχτελ γιά όλα αυτά... Ή είναι κι αυτός "Δύση"; Ή, οι ...γείτονές μας (σύμμαχοι της Κεντρικής Ευρώπης εκεί λίγο πριν την Συνθήκη του Τριανόν).
Παραθέτω το άρθρο του Startfor, μπας και το κατάλαβα ...λάθος.
A Hungarian Plan to Buy Land in Romania?
January 8, 2014 | 2212 GMT
Summary
The possibility that Hungary is considering buying land in Western Romania is part of a larger trend in Central Europe, which is undergoing changes as the European Union's crisis worsens and as Russia becomes stronger. Moreover, the potential move indicates the scope of Hungary's geopolitical concerns amid this regional dynamism and ahead of national elections.
Analysis
Hungary's meandering takeover negotiations with Austrian bank Raiffeisen have dominated regional and international discourse over the past two days. Stratfor noted yesterday that these talks are not just about a financial transaction -- they are also an expression of Hungary's unique set of policies in response to the strategic challenges it faces.
A diplomatic gaffe by a minor Hungarian government official Jan. 7 has garnered little international attention but is as worthy of examination as the Raiffeisen saga, if not more so. Szabo Jozsef Andor, the agriculture attache with the Hungarian Embassy in Bucharest, gave an interview to a Hungarian-language newspaper in Romania. According to the diplomat, Hungary is drafting a program through which to buy plots of land in Western Romania, where the Hungarian-speaking Szekely minority lives. The Hungarian Foreign Ministry's spokesperson publicly rejected the statement by the ambassador in Bucharest and even denied that his subordinate had given an interview about the issue. While controversial, this very idea fits into Central European countries' wider regional initiative to protect their economic and territorial control.
Another Paradigm Shift
The incident is another revelation of the extent of Budapest's geopolitical concerns and provides insight into the changing dynamics within Central Europe. For the past two decades, the perennial battleground between Russia and the West that spans the corridor between Poland and Bulgaria was quiet. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union and other European communist regimes, these countries found refuge in the seemingly ever-expanding and flourishing European Union. Now, the paradigm has shifted again. The European Union is mired in a deepening crisis, with Brussels increasingly focused on the problems of the eurozone countries as Russia becomes relatively more assertive. As a response, countries in Central and Eastern Europe are reassessing their foreign strategies.
The regional push to keep national control over agricultural lands is part of this trend. These moves have deep political significance in Central and Eastern Europe, a region where nationalism remains strong and most countries maintain century-old territorial disputes. In addition, ahead of Hungary's general elections to be held in the first half of 2014, Hungarians living abroad recently gained the right to vote -- making the issue of extraterritorial land ownership politically beneficial.
In Hungary, a country that still feels intensely slighted by the 1920 Treaty of Trianon, which dismembered the country and gave the lands in question to Romania, the media has focused on the potential purchase of territory in another country. However, this initiative is among several in the region whose more important goal is to prevent foreigners from buying land. When Central and Eastern European nations joined the European Union between 2004 and 2007, they were granted the right to apply moratoriums on the sale of lands to foreigners. These countries feared that individuals and companies in Western Europe would take advantage of their stronger economies and buy cheap farmland in the new member states. The transitional periods were supposed to end in January, prompting a string of counteractions by Central European countries.
In October 2013, Bulgaria's parliament controversially approved an extension of the moratorium on farmland sale to foreigners until 2020. Under pressure from the European Union, the law was brought up for assessment in the Bulgarian Constitutional Court. Bulgaria did not relent and announced that the country could set up an agency or commission to impose restrictive measures on land use by foreigners.
In the case of Romania, Bulgaria asked the EU Commission to allow a limit on the land sales for individual foreigners of 100 hectares -- a proposition that Brussels rejected. Bucharest is now trying to encourage Romanians to buy land by offering them economic incentives, such as state guaranteed loans. A new law passed at the end of 2013 set a series of buying pre-emption rights, which gives the state a greater degree of oversight on land sales.
In July 2012, the Hungarian government approved a bill banning foreign investors from buying farmland. Under pressure from the European Union, Budapest issued a new, toned-down version of the law in June 2013. The current law restricts land ownership to professional farmers who have lived and worked in Hungary for at least three years.
Even if some of Hungary's recent measures and statements from Hungarian officials ahead of the elections have a clear idiosyncratic tone, it is becoming more evident that Budapest is not alone in seeing the future ramifications of a weakening European Union and a rising Russia. The issue of control over national farmland is perhaps the first that has brought about the unilateral yet parallel shaping of policies in Central Europe. In the future, and for other issues, all countries in the region will not react exactly the same way, but from Poland to Bulgaria, it is becoming increasingly clear that an almost automatic alignment with the West is no longer the default foreign policy in light of growing uncertainty about the future of the Continent.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου